Catherwood LibraryILR School

Senate Republicans led by Bill Cassidy are pushing Congress to review the century-old congressional charter held by the National Education Association, arguing the union's ties to left-leaning curriculum groups and its financial conduct warrant reconsideration. The American Federation of Teachers was also singled out for its involvement in political protests and boycotts, suggesting the pressure campaign extends beyond one union. At its core, the fight is over how much political and ideological activity a labor organization representing millions of dues-paying educators can engage in without jeopardizing its institutional standing and federal recognition. If lawmakers act on the report, it could set a precedent for using union political conduct as grounds to strip organized labor of long-held legal protections.

Station Casinos' Red Rock property is asking the Supreme Court to pause enforcement of a National Labor Relations Board order compelling it to recognize and negotiate with the Culinary Workers Union, after the DC Circuit upheld that order in June. The bargaining order stems from a Gissel remedy, issued because the company's unfair labor practices were deemed severe enough to make a fair rerun election unlikely, even though workers had voted against unionizing in 2019. The case has become a flashpoint over how far federal labor law can go in imposing union representation when employer misconduct is found to have tainted the process. A Supreme Court stay would delay Red Rock's bargaining obligations while the broader legal challenge to the NLRB's authority plays out.

The House Education and Workforce Committee, chaired by Rep. Tim Walberg, has demanded years of financial records from the UAW, United Steelworkers, and three rail unions over claims that leadership funneled member dues into Democratic campaigns and lavish travel rather than workplace advocacy. Lawmakers frame the inquiry as a matter of union accountability, pointing to a widening gap between increasingly Republican-leaning rank-and-file members and their unions' political spending. The committee has signaled the findings could inform legislative changes to labor-management disclosure law or be referred to the Justice Department if wrongdoing is uncovered. Union leaders have pushed back, but the probe underscores growing tension between organized labor's traditional political alliances and the shifting politics of its own membership.

A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration unlawfully changed the H-2A agricultural worker visa program in ways that reduced wages for foreign farmworkers and could suppress wages for U.S. workers. The changes altered how employers' required wage rates were calculated and also allowed employers to deduct certain housing costs from workers' pay. The lawsuit was brought by the United Farm Workers union and other plaintiffs, who argued that the Labor Department had not properly followed the rulemaking process. The decision is significant for labor relations because immigration policy and agricultural labor standards directly affect both farmworkers' wages and employers' access to labor.

A National Labor Relations Board judge ruled that a waste-removal company violated federal labor law by refusing to sign a collective bargaining agreement with the Teamsters and subsequently reducing its union workforce. The company ultimately withdrew recognition of the union after cutting the number of union employees substantially. The ruling demonstrates the legal protections surrounding union recognition and collective bargaining after workers have organized. It also highlights the NLRB's role in addressing employer conduct that interferes with employees' rights to organize and bargain collectively.

Workers at South Korean shipbuilder HD Hyundai Heavy Industries voted to authorize a strike after negotiations over a new contract stalled. About 66% of eligible union members supported industrial action, exceeding the threshold required to legally strike. The union is seeking a monthly base-pay increase, higher bonuses, a share of company operating profits, and additional hiring, while the company has not yet presented a formal counterproposal. The dispute shows how workers can use the threat of a strike to gain leverage when collective bargaining negotiations fail to produce an agreement.

A union leader and data scientist at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Stephen Wheeler, was placed on administrative leave as the agency undergoes major changes under the Trump administration. Wheeler had been vocal about agency leadership and was active in representing CFPB employees through their union. The union has characterized his suspension as part of a broader pattern of intimidation and anti-union retaliation, while the agency has not publicly detailed any specific misconduct behind the action. The situation highlights the tension between government restructuring, employee rights, and union protections in the workplace.

Thousands of Airbus employees in Spain have resumed strike action after rejecting the company's latest proposal on pay and working conditions. Unions said roughly 90% of eligible workers participated in Tuesday's stoppage, which followed 22 days of industrial action in July. The unions have continued the strike while another mediation meeting is scheduled, putting additional pressure on Airbus to reach an agreement. The dispute is a clear example of collective bargaining and strike action being used to pressure an employer over wages and workplace conditions

An independent arbitrator has ordered The Washington Post to reinstate opinion columnist Karen Attiah with back pay and lost benefits after finding that her 2025 termination violated the newspaper's collective bargaining agreement. Attiah was fired over social media posts she made following the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, which the Post argued violated its social media policy. The arbitrator determined that the newspaper did not have sufficient cause for the termination and that the punishment was disproportionate. The case is particularly relevant to labor relations because it demonstrates how a union contract and arbitration process can protect employees from what they believe was unjust termination.

The Trump administration has proposed making a $103,265 fee permanent for new H-1B visa applications, which are commonly used by U.S. employers to hire highly skilled foreign workers. The proposed cost is dramatically higher than the previous typical fees of roughly $2,000 to $5,000 and could particularly affect technology, education, and research employers that rely on international talent. Business groups and several states have challenged the policy, arguing that the administration may not have the legal authority to impose such a large fee. From a labor-relations perspective, the proposal could significantly affect employers' ability to recruit foreign workers and could reshape hiring practices in industries that depend heavily on H-1B employees.